Dominion, per Webster, has a duality of roles, supremacy, and dependency. Per Genesis 1:26, we find God casting the first commandment upon man:
“…Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.”
A question was posed on social media that keeps me thinking, “What is the difference between puppy abortions and human abortions?” Why does it seem puppy abortions are hated, despised, and earn the public ire, but human abortions do not?
In conversation, it has fascinated me the mental gymnastics people will perform to separate human abortions from animal abortions. Expanding the question further, is there any difference between spade/neutering a pet or spade/neutering a human? China, for several generations, forced a “One Child Policy” that often included sterilization of the female to enforce this policy. Worse, industrialized nations are witnessing a rising generation who have been deluded into thinking they are a different gender than the one they were born into. They are put on puberty blockers, which chemically castrate/neuter permanently, and this is considered socially acceptable. Judges have ordered child molesters to be chemically castrated to “prevent” future abuse of children. Parents have been choosing, through abortion, to either keep a child based on gender characteristics, supposed health, or solely upon the perceived mental potential of a child in utero. Worse, these decisions seem to have become more socially acceptable, removing a perceived stigma, all to improve the genetics in a gene pool.
Thus, we are placing the question firmly into a place where we need to discuss reality. For generations, especially following the ever-popular Bob Barker (The Price is Right host), it has been insisted that pet ownership means spaying and neutering your pets. Have a pet bird, cow, donkey, pig, etc. responsible pet owners make sure they have their shots and that they are properly and permanently controlled in their sexual lives, even if this means aborting a pregnancy.
Why do we do these things?
It is a simple question: why do we do these things to animals but not to humans? The answer depends upon perception, choice, and the duality of the term dominion. As a supreme being to the animals, I can choose when they become pregnant, what bloodlines they carry forth, or the value of a mother in having progeny. As a dependent being with animals, I choose to live in balance with the animals, seeking their best interests and realizing they are as precious in the sight of God as I am. Does the perception, choice, and duality of dominion become clear?
Let us expand this into a modern discussion as an employer with dominion over employees, whose authority was granted through the US government through the IRS, who has provided dominion. I can choose to have supremacy or dependency attitudes where employees are concerned. I can enter into their private social media accounts, judge what is seen, and end their professional relationships with my company. Plenty of case laws support employers in legally punishing ex-employees for their social media posts; according to the government, this is acceptable behavior. Through a supreme attitude, I can force control over behaviors, attitudes, and identities, calling this corporate fit as part of marketing and business operations. Again, plenty of case law supports the employer in their efforts to build a company culture, regulating even constitutional rights and intellectual property of employees, all supported by government mandate. Is not an employer dependent upon an employee to perform work in that employer’s name?
Does the employer have dominion over when an employee has a child; yes, they do. However, this is often discussed as professional timing and incentives for regulating children are witnessed in stress, benefits, promotions, and the operational tempo of employment. Societal pressures regulate childbearing and rearing just as much as the employer. Through devaluing currency, inflation, tax rates, the need to have both people in a relationship working maximum hours, social pressures regulated by the government enforce control on childbearing decisions. Mix in other societal pressures, including social media posts, parents, religion, and more, and people struggle with juggling work, family, and goal attainment.
Surely, if an employer or the government were putting pressure on decision-makers where children are concerned, it would be big news, people would be up in arms, and insistence upon the duality of dominion, the dependency aspect would be emphasized, right? The reverse is more accurate. By seizing the supremacy aspect in dominion, it is presumed the dependency aspect can be ignored, things will continue, and if there are problems, other populations can be injected into the current society to make up the slack, thus opening other questions, such as defensible borders, assimilation of legal immigration into a dominant society, and much more.
Choices
Where the duality of dominion is concerned, a choice is made to believe in the right to control as a supreme authority and exclude the need for dependency upon those controlled. Alternatively, a choice is made to bring supremacy and dependence into harmony and create through options the unifying power where respect, dignity, and freedom can be nurtured, and all bodies in that system can coexist equally. Here is the problem: once you have the power, giving it back to the people you depend on is almost impossible.
Perceptions
Consider the pet. Does being a responsible pet owner mean spade/neutering, causing an abortion of a pregnancy, or worse, ending a pet’s life out of convenience or an unwanted pregnancy from lesser bloodlines? How many stories do we read where unwanted domesticated pets are thrown from car windows or left to die in the wild at the end of a street? How many times is this extended to human children? By perceiving dominion, we are presented with control over another life, which means we can make their choices for them as a supreme power. We perceive we have dominion, and because of this perception, then perceive ourselves as a supreme power, and only we can then take these perceptions and act through choice.
Consequences
What life is more important, a sparrow or a human? According to the New Testament, the sparrow is as important as a human, and when the sparrow falls, the heavens notice. What is the difference between an aborted human baby and an aborted puppy or kitten? The consequences of dominion when imbalanced are that lives are broken, potential is lost, and mental, physical, and spiritual problems arise. Does the person choosing to be supreme in their dominion escape their actions; no, this is an eternal principle; consequences follow choices.
I made a mistake; I wanted to help a fellow employee who had just adopted a couple of kittens whose house suddenly needed repairs and were suffering. I adopted the kittens from my co-worker, thinking this was a good thing. We did the responsible pet thing, got them their shots, had them neutered, and prepared for a long life with them. These kittens were deeply loved. Within six months of our adopting them, I had to order them put down. We had become homeless, moved from Maine to Ohio, and could not afford to keep them. Putting them down was considered “responsible pet ownership.” I was dependent upon those kittens for joy but could not provide for them; no shelter would take them, and in ordering and paying for their demise, I have been utterly tortured mentally, physically, and spiritually.
We cannot escape the consequences of how we choose to use our dominion. As employers/employees or citizens in a constitutional republic, we are constantly faced with perceptions, choices, actions, and the consequences of how we exercise dominion, and it all comes down to how we understand dominion. Do we choose to be supreme authorities, dictating life-altering decisions, or do we choose to understand we are all dependent on each other, and as dependent beings, we feel the consequences of our choices? Are we content to create harm as a supreme being?
I cannot, and will not, tell another person how to choose, for I have no authority and would not want it. Until we better understand the dominion we are commanded to possess and exercise, we will continue to suffer consequences that create pain, animosity, chaos, and, ultimately, destruction. We each have a duty and responsibility and will eventually come into accountability for our exercises of dominion’s powers. I hope we will make better choices, cognizant of our power of dominion, realizing the duality of dominion and tempering supremacy with dependency, for none of us live in a vacuum.
© Copyright 2023 – M. Dave Salisbury
The author holds no claims for the art used herein; the pictures were obtained in the public domain, and the intellectual property belongs to those who created the images. Quoted materials remain the property of the original author.