Seriously – Let’s Have the Conversation!

Hillary Clinton is infamous for an explosive remark made in a Congressional Bird of Preyhearing, “At this point, what difference does it make.”  While I genuinely detest quoting this particular person, she has a point where the 2020 Elections are concerned, not a good point, but a point.  At this point, what difference does it make in discussing the 15 Million votes from 2020 that were improperly counted, improperly handled, erroneously scrapped, and treated scandalously?  Will these votes change the fate of Afghanistan; no.  Will these votes remove the fraudulent president; no.  Will these votes correct an abuse of the voter in 2020 and place the real winner of the election into the presidency; no.

What difference “… at this point does it make?”  It changes how we move forward in voting.  It places the onerous upon current sitting politicians to safeguard voting systems, processes, and procedures to ensure this madness never occurs again!  Riddle me this, was COVID hyped and mass-fear spread to allow for voting to be abused to push a useless and senile president into office?  I digress.

Exclamation MarkHence, I would like to open the conversation into improving voting in America.  It is long past time for common sense voting safeguards to be installed and mandated at the local levels of government.  Here are my suggestions, let us use logic and discern the best path forward for America.

      1. Refuse the Federal Government legislation being pushed in the US House right now, the “For the People” Acts to demand a “Federal Government Mandate” for voting. Let’s be frank; the Federal Government could not handle collecting Social Security taxes from payroll and keeping that funded.  Do you really think they could handle something simpler, like voting?
      2. Eliminate the computers! I am done being some byte that a programmer can manipulate.  End the charade, open the transparency, and stop using vote computers.  A paper ballot is perfect!
      3. The paper ballot should carry a digital signature containing my picture in digital form and my digital signature, as verified by my government-issued ID. Don’t drive; that’s okay; you still need a government-issued ID to purchase alcohol, tobacco, firearms, take a plane trip, and a hundred and one other things.  The DMV can issue you an ID.  One ballot, one ID, one signature, one person, not hard to count, not hard to track, and no problems with security.  The technology has been around for 20 years to take and print a digital fingerprint; it is past time to combine a bio-metric tag, a digital tag, and a wet-signature with a ballot to end the nightmare of who completed the ballot.
      4. More transparency, more accountability, and more importantly, less mail-in balloting will mean sending teams to registered voters in hospice, long-term care settings, and hospitals and securing completed ballots using evidentiary procedures that can stand up in a court of law. Plus, it will mean penalties for breaking the law.  What happened in Maricopa County was a farce!  What happened in Atlanta and Philadelphia was a farrago. Too often, the primaries are just as fraud-riddled as the general elections speak volumes for the problems in local governments where laws are in place.  Still, the election officials always escape with their pensions intact into retirement.The Duty of Americans

Wisconsin, Michigan, Maine, New Mexico, Utah, Washington (especially Seattle Metro Area), Wyoming, Ohio, I wouldn’t think you have escaped scrutiny because the media left you alone in the 2020 election cycle.  I have personally witnessed the problems in your states, and I know how bad your elections are!  Worse, in New Mexico, primarily in Bernalillo County, I know the bad apples and remember them from being interviewed for a job.

Angry Grizzly BearOn the topic of local governments and Election Officials, apolitical should be the word of the day.  When a person walks into the election offices, they should not be bombarded with political messages.  Case in point, Bernalillo County, walk into the majority of the County offices, not just the election official’s offices, and look at the political affiliations on display.  Take a walk through the parking lot, look at bumper stickers, enter the offices, and find the same political messages on display in the people working inside.  You work for the government; apolitical is the least a person can expect from government employees; this is often referred to as professionalism!

Does being apolitical at work mean you lose your first amendment rights; yes!  Private-sector employees lose their rights; why should government employees keep their Constitutional Rights when private-sector employees lose their rights?  How fast will employment law change when government employees are treated like private-sector employees?  Yes, let’s have these conversations.  Let’s discuss these topics openly, in the public forums, on social media, in the town squares, and come to workable solutions.

© 2021 M. Dave Salisbury
All Rights Reserved
The images used herein were obtained in the public domain; this author holds no copyright to the images displayed.

Elections – Politics – California: I Support Larry Elder!

Angry Wet ChickenI support citizens who desire to become elected leaders.  I refuse to support politicians!  Worse, I detest with every fiber of my being politics in its many forms.  I hate politics and those who engage in politics from business to the military, from the classroom to the boardroom, and from the private sector to the government sector!  Elections matter until they are stolen and become a farce by those who desire to rule, and this is why California, the recall election of that detestable politician Gavin Newsom, and politics matter to every single person in America.  In the US Navy, when my department officer told me to “Play the game,” he meant to play politics.  To the minions of hell who delight in playing politics, I have found being honest, forthright, and valiant is better, and you will not win!

We begin with a review, for too often, people think they know the meaning of a word, and the entire etymology of that word is where the trouble lay.  Politics is one of these terms that comes with lots of baggage, tons of hidden layers, and enough plastic to choke the world’s oceans!  We must be clear about what politics is to recognize when political animals are trying to commit acts of political villainy.

What is Politics?

QuestionPlease note that emphasis has been added to key phrases to support knowledge of the complete etymology and enhance awareness.  Frankly, I would be ashamed to be called a politician.  Being called a politician means I possess a derogatory approach to my constituency and am only concerned with seeking power, usually through devious means.  As a Noun, politics are “the activities associated with the governance of a country or other area, especially the debate or conflict among individuals or parties having or hoping to achieve power.”

      • The activities of governments concerning the political relations between countries.”
      • The academic study of government and the state.”
      • Activities within an organization that aimed at improving someone’s status or position and are typically considered to be devious or divisive.”
      • A particular set of political beliefs or principles.”
      • The assumptions or principles relating to or inherent in a sphere, theory, or thing, especially when concerned with power and status in a society.”

As a Verb, politic/s is derogatory and is defined as “engaging in political activities.”

From Old French Politique “political,” Latin from Greek Politikos, and Polits “citizen” and Polis “city.”  Thus, we have described the term politics in all its glory and inhumanity.  Is the term more understood?

The Duty of AmericansPolitics is a descriptive tool used to identify certain human activities where power is sought, and devious means and divisive gestures are employed to obtain that power.  Every action tied to securing power through devious means and divisive gestures is politics or political, which means derogatory.  For those needing more, derogatory is “showing a critical or disrespectful attitude.”  Thus, at the root, politicians by their very name and nature are derogatory towards those who elect them into power.

What are Elections?

Exclamation MarkElections are the formal process for selecting another for an office, leadership, or choosing a person or favorable course of action.  Key to elections is that they are formal, which means there are rules, laws, guidelines, regulations, and penalties for the officers selected to monitor the election process.  One of the most egregious actions of the 2020 elections was breaking the rules, laws, and regulations of the formal election process in the primaries, which then extended into the actual election day results.  Why bring up the 2020 Federal Election farrago?  Because as of 25 August 2021, the same pattern is occurring in California, again!  Ballots are going missing, ballots are being dumped in trash cans, mail-in ballots without signatures, fraudulent ballots are being injected into the counts, etc., ad nauseam ad infinitum.

The 2020 Federal Election farrago proved that through fraud, deceit, and the purchase of local elected officials, elections could be thrown to whichever candidate had sufficient money to pay for the politics needed to win.  Where are integrity and honesty in the election process; they left for the Jersey shore, got mugged, and are lying under a “John Doe” in some backwater hospital on life support.  I support Larry Elder for Governor of California, but I do not think the Newsom Political machine will allow him a fair and honest election opportunity!

LookThus, the problem for ALL of AMERICA right now!  Primaries are coming, political futures hang in the balance, and the media know that the liberal madness and tyranny from COVID-Mandates has left a bitter taste in every person’s mouth.  The polls show no politician being trusted, and if the political machines are to keep paying dividends to special and private interests, then those investing in their favorite politician are going to have to pony up serious cash to buy the elections officials right now to protect the sleaze in office from the school board and Mayor to the president!

The elections in a representative government must remain sacrosanct, or representative government fails!  Yet, do you honestly trust the results of any of the elections since 2000 and the “Chad” fiasco in Florida?  I am not asking you to support any candidate; this platform does not advocate for or against any candidate.  I advocate for people; I advocate for liberty and the health of the American Republic.  Elections matter, voting is important, but politics is hurting America, and the citizenry needs to understand this concept.

Knowledge Check!Tell me, after the last two weeks of being ignored by the US President, with American Citizens being placed last, if at all, on the priority list in Afghanistan, do you feel represented by your government?  California, let’s discuss some truths; your politicians are some of the most hated and despised politicians in the American political system; they win with the lowest approval ratings and polling standards, time after time.  Sure, these politicians gerrymandered the living daylights out of their districts, but even then, they should have lost a long time ago.  Have you ever stopped to ask yourself why these hated imbeciles keep winning office in Sacramento and Washington DC?

California, how did Governor Moonbeam ever make a comeback in your state?  How did Newsom the loser ever keep his job as Mayor, let alone win the seat as governor?  I watched those elections; I keep asking myself how, why, where do the votes come from?  Then the Federal Election of 2020 occurred.  It became apparent; the patterns of winning in California have leaked across America. The same way to win keeping politicians in office in Chicago and Las Vegas moved to perfection in California and then across America.  Fraud, deceit, skullduggery, gerrymandering, and the political purchasing of local election officials and attorneys, judges, and other easily bribed public officials.

Does the derogatory nature, the hatred, and the duplicity of the politician shine through from those holding elected office right now?  Is the definition more clear and the need for sundering politics from government more apparent?  Is it clear why politics should not be part of government?Angry Grizzly Bear

Nobody is “Too BIG to Fail,” even the government, and it is past time for the elected officials and the bureaucrats dependent upon the political machine to begin to fear an open ballot box and an angry electorate!  It is time to ask who paid the postmen to dump the ballots?  Who paid the government employees to shuffle the ballots, copy ballots, and accept fraudulent votes?  It is past time to question the legitimacy, integrity, and informational security of the electronic voting machines and have transparency in voting.  It is past time for mandatory ID, one vote, one ID, and a biometric tag to protect against fraudulent ballots, stuffed ballot boxes, and mailed-in ballot duplicity.

cropped-bird-of-prey.jpgYou, the American citizen, are needed!  Awake and Arise!  Find your strength and stand before it is too late and your country has fallen an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle while you slept!  History will judge you and me for what we do and say right now; let them record we did not allow the American Experiment to fail on our watch; we fought back against the tide of tyranny and oppression and won!

© 2021 M. Dave Salisbury
All Rights Reserved
The images used herein were obtained in the public domain; this author holds no copyright to the images displayed.

NO MORE BS: Voting

Boris & NatashaMy email box was assaulted again; this time, the politicians who auto-email me, decided to crow about House Resolution 1, “The For the People Act.”  The politician this time, Rep. Deb Haaland (D), is “proud to co-sponsor” this legislative nightmare!  Frankly, the information contained in this proposed legislation makes me shudder and worry for America’s continuance!

Let us be perfectly clear, how a person votes is a State’s Right issue, not a Federal Government issue.  Hence, more Federal Government intrusion into a State’s Right issue is not acceptable, not warranted, and frankly will lead to greater conflict between the various States and the Federal Government.  Rep. Haaaland’s point is that some states saw the disaster that was the 2020 Presidential Election, and their legislatures are taking steps to improve the voting operations in their states.  Rep. Haaland wants to curb the State’s legislative powers to control how voting occurs.

LookDid you spot the first and most egregious issue?  States exercising their rights to self-government is bad, and the Federal Government is “obligated” to “step in” and manage those State’s internal affairs through legislated fiat!  The entire proposed action is 100% unconstitutional; yet, the legislation has been written and will probably pass into law, given the Senate and the President’s State of mind politically.

“But,” as they say on the Home Shopping Network, “There’s more!”

HR 1 aims to eliminate institutional barriers to voting, including cumbersome voter registration systems, disenfranchisement, and limited voting hours. This includes enacting automatic voter registration nation-wide and allowing same-day voter registration, expanding early and absentee voting, and reducing long lines and wait times, all while enhancing the security and integrity of our elections by restoring the Voting Rights Act and bolstering federal support for voting system security. HR 1 also directly challenges the influence of dark money in our elections by upgrading online political ad disclosures and requiring all politically active organizations to report their large donors. Americans shouldn’t have to worry about politicians being influenced by big money donors and placing special interests ahead of the public. This legislation addresses these challenges head on, amplifying the voices of the people over anonymous donors [sic].”

Detective 2What is “dark money” in politics?  “Dark Money” is any money that goes to a political party not approved by Democrats and the militant liberal leftists.  Ever since Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission Supreme Court Decision, the militant liberals have screamed holy murder over “Dark Money” in politics.  Yet, when those same sources send money to the Democrats, the money is not “Dark money” but a patriotic symbol to free America from oppression.  Take any corporation that donates to both parties, and you will find that the funds opposed to non-Democratic parties and interests are called “Dark Money,” but it is not “Dark money” if that money goes to the Democrats and their pet issues.

“Voice of the people,” interesting choice of words there Rep. Haaland (D).  From the Nov 2020 elections to the inauguration of the fraudulent President, the people asked for the litigation to finish, the investigations into blatant fraud to conclude, and then see who had “won” the Nov 2020 elections for President.  Where were you when the “Voice of the People” asked for time to have justice complete the investigation?  Your proposed legislation wants to “improve election integrity,” yet everything proposed does nothing but decrease voting integrity and increase risks for the electorate to continue to be abused!

GavelThe Nov 2020 election showed the world the problems with mail-in ballots, but you want to increase the fraud opportunities and risks in elections by expanding the precise programs that generate fraud in elections.  Are you sure this is the “Voice of the people” or just personal interests and political ambitions?  Same-day voter registration is another State’s Right issue that more Federal involvement will generate more significant fraud opportunities and risks.  Are you positive same-day voter registration is the “Voice of the people?”  Because frankly, I am appalled at the same-day voter registration, the mail-in balloting measures, and absentee-voting schemes currently in operation, and I am not alone in having these concerns.

State-issued, picture voter ID with biometric tags, using a thumbprint and signature on the ballot, are common-sense ballot initiatives that need to be explored and discussed in the various State Legislatures and worked into law.  But, a Federal Voter ID is NOT acceptable!  America is a Republic.  The chaos we pay for 50-different states doing things their own way is precious.  I, for one, will not have the Federal Government imposing a one-size-fits-none pattern over America where the State’s become ever more subservient to the Federal Government.

LinkedIn ImageRep. Haaland (D) and Rep. Sarbanes (D), you are both in the wrong and need to scrap this disastrous piece of legislation!  Destroying the State’s Rights to control voting is an abomination and unconstitutional.  If you cannot see this, your voters can, and it is time you learned to obey the voice of the people!  Support a “Liberty FIRST Culture!”

© 2021 M. Dave Salisbury
All Rights Reserved
The images used herein were obtained in the public domain; this author holds no copyright to the images displayed.

NO MORE BS: Voting is a Privilege

Note: Today, we revisit a previous topic due to continued confusion about the difference between a right and a privilege.

Yes, the U.S. Constitution declares, no less than five times, that voting is a right.  Except, before the U.S. Constitution was written, voting was understood as a privilege that could be granted and withdrawn; thus, the U.S. Constitution’s insistence that the government listens to the citizenry through elections.  As a noun, Webster defines privilege as “a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group.”  Voting is not a right as discussed and defined in the U.S. Bill of Rights, but rather as a privilege, as described above.  Under the U.S. Bill of Rights, the difference is critical; an act of government cannot remove those rights. In contrast, an act of government can remove the voting privilege, driving privilege, and marriage or business privileges, which they extend through licensure or other bureautic controls.

Fast forward to 2020, and through the actions of the uncouth and the uneducated, as well as the agendas of conspiring men and women, and through the plasticization of words, we find a need to re-emphasize the difference between a right and a privilege.  A right is not granted or withdrawn by a government, originates in a higher power, and a right may be infringed but never removed from a person.  Rights include property, life, moral agency, and so forth.

A privilege is a government-granted opportunity.  For example, a driver’s license is a privilege.  There is a power (government) that dictates behavior (speed limits, where one can drive, and how to behave while driving).  All of these are enforced by government agents (police, highway patrol, etc.), which demand adherence to the privilege of driving and the social order that emanates from the proper and controlled exercise of that privilege.  Is the pattern clear?  A power greater than an individual extends an opportunity that can be withdrawn, based upon bending the individual’s rights (moral agency) to the dictates of an enforceable social order.

Elected Officials will eventually use the term “privilege” when describing being elected; this is correct, as we, the people, are the higher authority over government.  We have the privilege of electing you, or not electing you, to the office you currently hold.  Thus, the people are the government’s governing authority, not the elected politicians; this is also in the U.S. Constitution.  However, the government retains the ability to hold or not hold elections as a privilege for living in a democratic republic.

19 January 2020, an email was sent from the office of a Congressional Representative that was so plasticized in wording as to attempt to make reasonable and kind extending the privilege of voting to those who have sundered, through their own actions, their ability to exercise their privilege to vote.  Let us be clear; this is unacceptable!  When a person drinks too much, operates a vehicle, and obtains a legally set amount of charges for operating under the influence, that person’s driving privileges are revoked.  Society says this is a good thing as this person has declared they are a clear and present danger behind the wheel of an automobile and cannot control their moral agency.  The person losing their driving privileges exercised their moral agency (a right) to abuse their government-appointed privileges.

The same logic then patterns the problem with criminals and the privilege of voting.  These people have chosen to act (a right) and lost their privileges as a direct consequence.  If the convicted person had wanted full and unrestricted privileges, that person should not have broken society’s trust (laws).  I cannot make this argument any more precise, and politician advocacy for more votes from illegal aliens and convicted criminals is an egregious testament to their lack of substance as a politician.  Can you not win elections without the dead, criminals, and aliens voting for you?

When the privileges of convicted criminals come before the law-abiding citizenry, the politician is the problem, not the answer!  You, Congresswoman Deb Haaland (D), are the problem in this scenario as you blatantly refuse to represent all your constituents.  Your conspiring is emboldening the enemies of America, to the detriment of law and order, which is the sole reason you were elected.  Through the election process, we hired you to protect law and order, representing all your constituents in matters that we cannot ourselves exercise.

You, Elected Officials, have been, and while privileged to hold your office, remain being measured, and you are found wanting!  Proof of this can be found in the email sent, received, and copied below!

From: Representative Debra Haaland <NM01DH.Outreach@mail.house.gov>
To:
Date: Jan 19, 2020, 11:05 AM
Subject: Voting is a Right
Mailed-by: mail.house.gov
Signed-by: mail.house.gov
Security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

19 January 2020

Dear Mr. Salisbury,

Tomorrow we celebrate and honor Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Although he was assassinated more than fifty years ago, his legacy stays with us through organizations fighting racism, like Black Lives Matter, and in Congress as we work towards a more just criminal justice system, worker rights, and equal access to the ballot box.

Throughout his life, Martin Luther King, Jr., fought for equality, justice, and the fundamental democratic right to vote. Systemic discrimination in the criminal justice system leads to a present-day [sic] threat to Dr. King’s fight for the right to vote. Today there are people who served their sentences and are expected to integrate back into society, but are being refused the right to vote.

States across the country, including New Mexico, have restored the right to vote for all free citizens, but other states institute a lifelong ban on voting. House Committee on the Judiciary Chairman Nadler introduced H.R. 196, the Democracy Restoration Act, to restore the right to vote to those who have served their debt to society.

Thank you so much for letting me know your thoughts on this important issue. It helps me serve as your representative.

Sincerely,
[Auto Pen Signature]
Member of Congress

P.S. 2020 is a Census year and we have a responsibility to our communities to make sure everyone is counted. Starting on 12 March, you can respond to the Census by phone, online, paper, or in person. It is safe, easy, and critical. My staff in Albuquerque will be available to help if you have any questions. The Census Bureau also needs hundreds of part-time employees to help with this task and can accommodate full-time workers who would like the extra income.You can learn more on the Census website here.

As an independent voter, I hold myself, and those claiming to represent me, to the same high standards of logic, behavior, and action.  When I fall short, I have consequences.  I firmly believe that when elected officials fail to represent their entire district, they also should have direct consequences, up to and including judicial actions that hold them financially liable for abusing the trust the people placed upon them.  America used to hold her politicians to a higher standard of behavior because these elected officials represent more than just themselves.

Where did the power to hold elected officials derive?

Education, social norms, and a single “Rule of Law” as granted by the U.S. Constitution.  But, when the liberals and leftists took over the government-mandated classroom (1960), the dumbing down of Americans began to the detriment of the citizens and the power of the government elected and unelected officials.  The changes to the legal definitions of property started as early as 1930, and by 1943 Charles Reich was writing about how lost America had become.  Hence, the path to holding these elected and unelected officials of government responsible is reversing the dumbing down of America.  We, the citizens, need to educate ourselves, then teach others, so we can then begin to learn more perfectly.  As we gain knowledge, separating the plastic words and intentions, we can discern who to vote for, and blessed change will occur!

© 2021 M. Dave Salisbury
All Rights Reserved
The images used herein were obtained in the public domain.  This author holds no copyright to the images displayed.  The author has no claim upon the quoted materials.