NO MORE BS: Voting is a Privilege

Note: Today, we revisit a previous topic due to continued confusion about the difference between a right and a privilege.

Yes, the U.S. Constitution declares, no less than five times, that voting is a right.  Except, before the U.S. Constitution was written, voting was understood as a privilege that could be granted and withdrawn; thus, the U.S. Constitution’s insistence that the government listens to the citizenry through elections.  As a noun, Webster defines privilege as “a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group.”  Voting is not a right as discussed and defined in the U.S. Bill of Rights, but rather as a privilege, as described above.  Under the U.S. Bill of Rights, the difference is critical; an act of government cannot remove those rights. In contrast, an act of government can remove the voting privilege, driving privilege, and marriage or business privileges, which they extend through licensure or other bureautic controls.

Fast forward to 2020, and through the actions of the uncouth and the uneducated, as well as the agendas of conspiring men and women, and through the plasticization of words, we find a need to re-emphasize the difference between a right and a privilege.  A right is not granted or withdrawn by a government, originates in a higher power, and a right may be infringed but never removed from a person.  Rights include property, life, moral agency, and so forth.

A privilege is a government-granted opportunity.  For example, a driver’s license is a privilege.  There is a power (government) that dictates behavior (speed limits, where one can drive, and how to behave while driving).  All of these are enforced by government agents (police, highway patrol, etc.), which demand adherence to the privilege of driving and the social order that emanates from the proper and controlled exercise of that privilege.  Is the pattern clear?  A power greater than an individual extends an opportunity that can be withdrawn, based upon bending the individual’s rights (moral agency) to the dictates of an enforceable social order.

Elected Officials will eventually use the term “privilege” when describing being elected; this is correct, as we, the people, are the higher authority over government.  We have the privilege of electing you, or not electing you, to the office you currently hold.  Thus, the people are the government’s governing authority, not the elected politicians; this is also in the U.S. Constitution.  However, the government retains the ability to hold or not hold elections as a privilege for living in a democratic republic.

19 January 2020, an email was sent from the office of a Congressional Representative that was so plasticized in wording as to attempt to make reasonable and kind extending the privilege of voting to those who have sundered, through their own actions, their ability to exercise their privilege to vote.  Let us be clear; this is unacceptable!  When a person drinks too much, operates a vehicle, and obtains a legally set amount of charges for operating under the influence, that person’s driving privileges are revoked.  Society says this is a good thing as this person has declared they are a clear and present danger behind the wheel of an automobile and cannot control their moral agency.  The person losing their driving privileges exercised their moral agency (a right) to abuse their government-appointed privileges.

The same logic then patterns the problem with criminals and the privilege of voting.  These people have chosen to act (a right) and lost their privileges as a direct consequence.  If the convicted person had wanted full and unrestricted privileges, that person should not have broken society’s trust (laws).  I cannot make this argument any more precise, and politician advocacy for more votes from illegal aliens and convicted criminals is an egregious testament to their lack of substance as a politician.  Can you not win elections without the dead, criminals, and aliens voting for you?

When the privileges of convicted criminals come before the law-abiding citizenry, the politician is the problem, not the answer!  You, Congresswoman Deb Haaland (D), are the problem in this scenario as you blatantly refuse to represent all your constituents.  Your conspiring is emboldening the enemies of America, to the detriment of law and order, which is the sole reason you were elected.  Through the election process, we hired you to protect law and order, representing all your constituents in matters that we cannot ourselves exercise.

You, Elected Officials, have been, and while privileged to hold your office, remain being measured, and you are found wanting!  Proof of this can be found in the email sent, received, and copied below!

From: Representative Debra Haaland <NM01DH.Outreach@mail.house.gov>
To:
Date: Jan 19, 2020, 11:05 AM
Subject: Voting is a Right
Mailed-by: mail.house.gov
Signed-by: mail.house.gov
Security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

19 January 2020

Dear Mr. Salisbury,

Tomorrow we celebrate and honor Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Although he was assassinated more than fifty years ago, his legacy stays with us through organizations fighting racism, like Black Lives Matter, and in Congress as we work towards a more just criminal justice system, worker rights, and equal access to the ballot box.

Throughout his life, Martin Luther King, Jr., fought for equality, justice, and the fundamental democratic right to vote. Systemic discrimination in the criminal justice system leads to a present-day [sic] threat to Dr. King’s fight for the right to vote. Today there are people who served their sentences and are expected to integrate back into society, but are being refused the right to vote.

States across the country, including New Mexico, have restored the right to vote for all free citizens, but other states institute a lifelong ban on voting. House Committee on the Judiciary Chairman Nadler introduced H.R. 196, the Democracy Restoration Act, to restore the right to vote to those who have served their debt to society.

Thank you so much for letting me know your thoughts on this important issue. It helps me serve as your representative.

Sincerely,
[Auto Pen Signature]
Member of Congress

P.S. 2020 is a Census year and we have a responsibility to our communities to make sure everyone is counted. Starting on 12 March, you can respond to the Census by phone, online, paper, or in person. It is safe, easy, and critical. My staff in Albuquerque will be available to help if you have any questions. The Census Bureau also needs hundreds of part-time employees to help with this task and can accommodate full-time workers who would like the extra income.You can learn more on the Census website here.

As an independent voter, I hold myself, and those claiming to represent me, to the same high standards of logic, behavior, and action.  When I fall short, I have consequences.  I firmly believe that when elected officials fail to represent their entire district, they also should have direct consequences, up to and including judicial actions that hold them financially liable for abusing the trust the people placed upon them.  America used to hold her politicians to a higher standard of behavior because these elected officials represent more than just themselves.

Where did the power to hold elected officials derive?

Education, social norms, and a single “Rule of Law” as granted by the U.S. Constitution.  But, when the liberals and leftists took over the government-mandated classroom (1960), the dumbing down of Americans began to the detriment of the citizens and the power of the government elected and unelected officials.  The changes to the legal definitions of property started as early as 1930, and by 1943 Charles Reich was writing about how lost America had become.  Hence, the path to holding these elected and unelected officials of government responsible is reversing the dumbing down of America.  We, the citizens, need to educate ourselves, then teach others, so we can then begin to learn more perfectly.  As we gain knowledge, separating the plastic words and intentions, we can discern who to vote for, and blessed change will occur!

© 2021 M. Dave Salisbury
All Rights Reserved
The images used herein were obtained in the public domain.  This author holds no copyright to the images displayed.  The author has no claim upon the quoted materials.

Advertisement

The Vital Job of an Elected Official – Knowing is Half the Battle

The election of 2020 has shown the importance of transparency and neutrality in the election process, as in no other election throughout American History. The 2020 election has also supplied the perfect backdrop to understanding the roles of elected officials in elections. The current holder of an elected office oversees and is responsible for ensuring that their last official act is the election that will replace them in office.

PatriotismPresident Trump has done an admiral job as an elected official in avoiding identity politics, attempting to improve the election process, and honoring the “Rule of Law” in America. Yet, despite all the President’s efforts, the 2020 Election to either rehire him, or replace him, has been fraught with fraud, technological cheating, and deception. All because each level of elected officials, Federal, State, County, City, failed in their most important duty, protecting election integrity.

Most American Citizens would agree that integrity is all about being honest and having strong moral principles. Yet, some American Citizens might have difficulty with the other implications’ integrity brings to the issue of elections. Namely, “integrity declaring, a state of being whole and undivided; internal consistency; lacking corruption in electronic data; the condition of being unified, unimpaired, or sound in construction” (Websters Dictionary, 2020).

The Duty of AmericansUnfortunately, or fortunately, even those committing the fraud and deception are failing the integrity test; because integrity requires at its most fundamental base, trust and truth between parties. The elected officials do not trust the people and do not want to give up power ill-gottenly gained to America’s citizens. Those paying for the fraud and deception all have different personal agendas and only came together on one item, theft of the election process for personal gain.  Thus, the entire force is built on possible common interest sand, instead of building upon the bedrock of truth and trust.

The elected officials are derelict in their most important duty, and this dereliction was intentional. How does a citizen know the elected officials’ actions were deliberate; none of the voting irregularities discovered in the primaries was investigated and corrected. By carefully reviewing the primaries’ data, the same patterns are found during the November election are revealed. The media called the irregularities in the primaries mistakes. They scoffed, but the same behavior found in the primaries of the 2020 Elections is glaringly apparent in the November 2020 elections, and every candidate and issue is tainted by the fraud found and substantiated. Even a single dead person voting is fraud and requires investigation before the results are certified.

GI JoeConsider for a moment your job, your profession; if you failed in your most critical role, would you expect to have a job for very long? Consider a car mechanic who fails to repair a car; that mechanic will not be a mechanic for long. A nurse who routinely gives out incorrect medication dosages or gives medication to the wrong patients will not be a nurse for long. What about a contractor who builds buildings without proper foundations or the police officer who bullies and betrays their badge. Yet, the elected officials who conducted the farce called the 2020 Elections are not being fired for dereliction of duty. The elected officials will not be held accountable for the taxpayer monies wasted, the candidate’s time and money wasted, nor will they be removed from office. Yet they deserve all these consequences and more.

One of President Trump’s first actions in office was to call for a cleaning of the voter rolls and cull the fraud found in the 2016 Elections. Yet, his call went unanswered by many counties, fighting broke out in other counties, and the media harassed and denigrated anyone hoping to contribute until nothing could be accomplished. Thus, the same problems from earlier elections were used and new and more insidious methods to steal the 2020 Elections.

The people responsible for the fraud in the elections in American History are your neighbors. The county governments across America are generally accountable for holding fair and transparent elections and sending the election results to the government to declare the winners and losers in elections. However, these same elected and unelected people overseeing elections at the county and city level have decided that they are the Praetorian Guard of America and deserve to choose who belongs in office and who does not, to the detriment of the citizens casting their votes.

moral-valuesHow have they usurped this power and keep this power; by refusing common-sense voter ID laws and flooding the ballots with mail-in ballots and technological solutions that cannot be traced to a single voter. Common sense voter ID laws include showing a government-issued picture ID before being handed a ballot to vote. Consider the following, to enter a government building; you need both a picture ID and a purpose for being there. To board an airplane, you need a government picture ID. To legally buy alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana, you need a government-issued picture ID. In fact, in many states, driving without a license on your person is a quick trip to jail and is a multiplier of charges when caught. Yet, showing an ID or printing the tracking number/serial number of the ID on a ballot is considered too demanding and has been fought viciously to perpetuate voting inconsistencies and allow fraud in elections.

In multiple countries worldwide, it is considered a regular election practice to tie a ballot to a person with a fingerprint, a signature, and a government-issued ID. Yet, in the United States of America, a free Republic (if we can keep it), showing ID continues to be claimed too difficult and denies the poor their ability to vote. Yet how many of those “poor people” can produce an ID for everything they want to buy or enter a government building or board a plane. The politicians of America are derelict in their duties where the most basic office roles are concerned, and guaranteeing integral and transparent elections, is the issue that politicians need to be held accountable to perform.

To the citizens of America, regardless of political stripe, seize the power of the elections by holding your neighbors paid by your taxes accountable for dereliction of duty. These neighbors are wasting your money for their benefit, and this practice must cease. Not with more government intrusion, but with citizens demanding, insisting, and declaring these practices must stop forthwith. Demand less technology in the voting process! Demand an end to mail-in balloting! Demand common-sense voter ID laws that protect the integrity of the electoral process!  Insist that the voter rolls be scoured annually, and a report provided by these county officials showing the voter roll integrity standard has been reached. Failure to provide the report, or to properly clean the voter rolls, should have sharp consequences. Error rates for an election should be exceptionally low when these actions are properly taken.

Image - Eagle &amp; FlagAmerica will not long survive as the “Shining city upon a hill” if the problems with election laws, the lack of common-sense voter ID laws, and the dead continue to vote in America’s election processes! We, the citizens of America, must act! Not the Supreme Court Justices or any other judge, not legislators, and indeed not the winners of the 2020 Elections. “We The People” are responsible and need to step up to retrieve the power stolen by our neighbors.

© Copyright 2020 – M. Dave Salisbury
The author holds no claims for the art used herein. The pictures were obtained in the public domain, and the intellectual property belongs to those who created the images.
All rights reserved. For copies, reprints, or sharing, please contact through LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/davesalisbury/

Election Fraud – Understanding Begets Opportunities for Change

Image - John Wayne QuoteA noted fact in American History, not favorable, but factual; in every election the dead will vote for the political left.  When the dead vote, this is fraud.  Fraud is generally defined in terms as, any wrongful or criminal deception, with intent, that results in financial or personal gain.  Logic relates that the dead, being dead, are not eligible to vote in an election; yet, somehow, the dead continue to vote.

To qualify for the legal term of fraud, there must be three conditions met, deception must occur, intent established, and someone gains personally or financially.  A friend asked, how is the dead voting fraudulent, meeting the three criteria for committing fraud?  First condition to meet fraud, a deceptive action is committed, completing the election ballot for someone else, or in someone else’s name is deceptive.  Second condition, intent; intent is established in criminal law by showing that first the defendant knows right from wrong, then can understand what they are doing is wrong, and both conditions can be met with circumstantial evidence.

For example, simply asking a person if they knew what they were doing when performing an action, and if that person can distinguish between right and wrong after the action has occurred, can easily establish intentions.  If a person has chosen previously between right and wrong, their intent can be used to reflect they still know right from wrong, barring any traumatic experience or injury to the head.  Again, intent is easily witnessable and provable.

Third and finally, personal gain or financial profit.  Essentially the Greeks gave us this piece of legal thinking by asking, Cui Bono and Cui ProdestCui Bono? is a rhetorical Latin legal phrase used to imply that whoever appears to have the most to gain from a crime is probably the culprit.  Cui Prodest? is a Latin term which means “who profits?”.  Generally used to raise a similar question as “Cui Bono,” and specifically to point out the fact that those who benefit from an event are likely to be responsible for causing that event.  Thus, since the Political Left, in America’s political system this is currently the Democrats and those who support leftist political ideology, are the only party to benefit from dead voting, it is easy to draw a conclusion that the political left is intentionally committing fraud in elections for personal gain.

Government Largess 2What is gained in committing election fraud; the gain is political power, favorable laws, a compliant media to fawn upon you, and personal gain.  My friend asked me how a politician gains financially by being elected.  I responded, how did Ex-President Bill Clinton in the year after leaving the White House, just making 57 speeches, earn $13.7 Million in speaking and writing fees?  One year, 57 different speeches, a little writing, and $13.7 Million USD just appeared.  This is but a single example of how politicians, and ex-politicians, turn momentary fame in the ballot box into lifelong Millions of dollars.

My friend was very specific, how do you tell who committed the fraud in elections?  Do you try to go to the source, as in who completed the ballot, or do you just lump the fraud together into one big case and hold those gaining from deception responsible?  I do not know how to answer this question and stated so.  In my small knowledge about the law, the answer to me, appears to lie in legal strategy played by a prosecutor; however, I could be very wrong.  What I do know, is that “those that gain, need to either hang together, or hang separately, but they need to hang!”

Here is the real problem with fraud of any kind, but especially election fraud, trust.  When those voting lose trust in the process to elect a candidate to a political office, regardless of politics, that trust is fickle.  Easily lost in seconds, never fully regained.  Worse, the taint of fraud cannot be expunged and all in that election are tainted equally, the winner and the loser.

Lady JusticeHowever, one of the legal issues facing the calls to clean up voter records and the fraud of dead people voting is the legal hairsplitting between intentional and unintentional fraud.  Unintentional fraud is also referred to as negligent misrepresentation.  If you, as a citizen concerned about election fraud are confused, it is okay, this is a lawyer’s bread and butter, and a logical person’s headache.

Several of the legal challenges made by politicians after an election have been thrown out of court or received judgments that the case has no proof of fraud, even though there are clear indications that a normal person can see of dead people voting and a dead person voting is fraudulent.  All based upon the problems of holding a group responsible for committing fraud, versus a single person.  Herein lies the problem.

A county in the United States has an election office.  That county’s election office holds the reigns on county elections, overseen by the state.  Under the US Constitution, State’s Rights have already caused a Civil War and as such remain a very testy issue in the Supreme Court.  The Federal Government, and other State Governments, cannot force, cajole, threaten, or coerce a state to clean up their voter rolls.  Thus, if the dead vote in an election, this is a State’s Rights issue, not a Federal Government issue.

2017 and 2018, President Trump made an honest attempt to ask, beg, and entice the individual states and counties to clean up their voter rolls.  Except, Corporate Media, Democrats, and some Republicans fought tooth and nail to squash President Trump’s efforts to have an honest and transparent election in 2020.  My friend asked me, how do you know the voter rolls need cleaned up?  Because during the run up to the 2020 election, I began receiving text messages from state’s I have not lived in for years or decades, asking me to vote for a specific candidate or platform.

LinkedIn ImageAs an independent voter, I generally never become entangled in the mess surrounding elections.  Yet, in 2020, not a day past without a text from Wisconsin, Ohio, Maine, Wyoming, Michigan, Montana, New Mexico, Utah, Washington, or Arizona political action committees or the democratic party representatives contacting me to urge me to vote for a democratic candidate or democratic favored piece of legislation.  While I have not checked, I would not be surprised to see I had voted in every single previous state of residence, all because mail-in ballots were sent out and my records were still live and active on all those state rolls.  If I, as an independent voter received this harassment, I can only guess what it was like for those who had political party membership.

Still the courts, at the bequest of lawyers, refuse to call fraud, and judge a logical decision.  If a dead person votes, someone committed fraud.  Since the fraud always benefits one party over any other party, than that entire political party needs to be held accountable for perpetuating that fraud, encouraging fraud, and for benefiting from the fraud committed by operatives.  Election fraud does not happen only through dead voting.  There is vote harvesting, where operatives are expected to canvass neighborhoods to “help” those unable to get out to the polls to complete their ballots.  Except reality reflects a bunch of people sitting at tables filling out blank ballots.

We also have another interesting technique in committing fraud, hacked election machines.  Where technically the voter machine “glitches” and a republican vote becomes a democratic vote.  Except, these errors are not actually errors, but programmed methods for stealing an election in the United States.  Fraud and theft are pretty much the same crime, while the lawyers wet themselves from trying to separate these into two different crimes, the fact remains if John Smith votes Republican and all John’s votes are turned democrat through technical means, John’s voice has been stolen from him and this is basic theft.  Not a technical malfunction, pure and unadulterated theft.

Mail-in ballots in the run up to November 2020’s election was a big issue; why, because this is another excellent method for stealing ballots, negating a person’s voice, and perpetuating fraud.  Mail-in ballots in 2020 had problems being delivered to voters, being returned to the county timely, or at all in a couple of cases, and being handled in a manner that allowed a person’s voice to be marked according to their preferences.

President AdamsIn every county and state in America, ballot dumps occurred.  In the six states causing the most problems, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, North Carolina, and Nevada, we find the most egregious ballot dumps.  Pennsylvania had 90,000 votes dumped into counting in the early hours.  Where did these votes come from?  Why did more than 89,000 votes for Biden and a third-party candidate, when the regular population mix would have these vote totals much lower?

Finally, we have the real issue in correcting, auditing, and holding honest elections, money!  Holding an election is expensive; thus, a taxpayer would think that those counting the ballots would be considerate and do their jobs right the first time.  Except, this is not the case, and every day that passes without a certified election increases the costs of that election.  Add in court and legal fees, and the election costs skyrocket into deficit spending rapidly.  Yet, when fraud occurs because those in the county election offices actively work to muddy an election’s results, why are these people not required to pay for their political shenanigans?

Consider a simple example, a baker makes a mistake on a product, the costs involved in the first attempt are the bakers to absorb, not the customer who needs the product delivered.  A car mechanic cannot escape the costs and consequences if they make a mistake in diagnosing a problem, or if a newly repaired vehicle winds up causing an accident due to mechanical failure.  Yet, these election results, a product of the county election officials hired to perform an honest election, too often get certified and real harm is done to the taxpayers in that county, and the officials remain in comfortable jobs able to meddle in future elections to their greedy little hearts content.

The Duty of AmericansIs the problem clear regarding where the fraud occurs; because, at the end of the day election theft and fraud is a local government issue with national repercussions.  Due to a law that insists that every veteran applying for a city, county, state job gets interviewed; I interviewed with a county election office.  The interviewers all came in spouting, neigh on screaming, their political agendas, we had a well-used PETA coffee mug, coats with patches and marketing materials for democratic candidates and clauses, a parking lot full of leftist political stickers, and I was hoping to obtain a job I was overqualified for, but desperately needed.  The interview began with a hostile attitude towards me and I knew within 2-minutes that I was not going to win this job.  All due to my not declaring publicly my political leanings.  Diversity laws include diversity of thinking which empowers checks and balances in operation; yet local governments across the country have become silent mouthpieces for totalitarian government.

America, the 2020 election is a sham, a farse, a perfect example of how to steal a federal election, and every candidate is equally tainted from the fraud committed.  Fixing the election fraud will require local elections to demand a clean sweep of every single elected official and staff member in local government election offices.  A full and complete refusal to use technical means to handle elections in any way, shape, or form.  Plus, fraud laws need tightened with harsher consequences.  The 2020 election was stolen, and a usurper is set to fill the presidency, fraud in elections has reached the ultimate tipping point, and represents a breakdown of trustworthy government from the dog catcher to the President, taints every single elected official, and requires the citizens of America to reclaim the government and demand those parties responsible, including the corporate media, to be held accountable!

PatriotismIf the American Republic is to endure America must have fair, transparent, and trustworthy elections as the first and most basic building block of responsible government!

© Copyright 2020 – M. Dave Salisbury
The author holds no claims for the art used herein, the pictures were obtained in the public domain, and the intellectual property belongs to those who created the pictures.
All rights reserved.  For copies, reprints, or sharing, please contact through LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/davesalisbury/